Counseling
Divorced
LDS
Single
Parent
Fathers
by
Edwin G.
Brown, Ph.D.
and
Au-Deane S. Cowley, Ph.D. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Divorce is not an unusual
phenomenon, even in the Church. Its frequency makes it a
significant family process and counselors are apt to spend a
great deal of time helping families through the grief and
hopefully onto growth. Divorce can be a constructive solution to
family pain—or a shock and devastating disappointment. During
the process of divorce, there are certain fundamental
generalizable tasks that must be resolved. This paper will deal
with counselor tasks in helping
divorced
single
parent
fathers resolve the stages of divorce, and move onto a
new parenting role—either as the visiting or custodial
parent. Major practice principles and concepts will be
discussed in terms of their implication and adaptation for use
by L.D.S. counselors and L.D.S. clients. |
|
| |
|
|
| According to Wiseman, divorce
resolution can be divided into five overlapping stages: (1)
denial; (2) loss and depression; (3) anger and ambivalence; (4)
re-orientation of lifestyle and identity; and (5) acceptance and
integration (Wiseman, 205-212). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
1. Denial—Denial as a defense
mechanism begins during the "emotional divorce" period, which
usually preceeds the actual legal divorce. Some marriages remain
together even though the couple is emotionally
divorced, in a kind of "empty shell" or cared house
marriage (Bach, 1969). This is a common occurrence in L.D.S.
families, because of the strong emphasis on the family unit as
an eternal union. Divorce action, often triggered by a
precipitating event, puts the family into crisis. This results
in a justification for taking action. Due to pervasive support
from the Church to keep marriages and family intact, for actice
L.D.S. couples the precipitating event is frequently of a more
serious nature. Not uncommonly, the precipitating event is a
serious infraction of Church doctrine, such as infidelity. This
infraction has dual repercussions in the Ward as well as the
family. Where one's Church membership is put in jeopardy, it may
be used to rule out any chances for reconciliation. Counselors
working with such a family will have to help family |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Often part of owning reality and
not denying the marital problems anymore includes re-evaluation
of the entire marriage. Active Mormons not uncommonly take
Church doctrine about celestial marriage and perfection to set
up unrealistic expectations for their current stage of
development. As a result, there is no place for conflict in
marriage and family, only guilt when conflict emerges as a
result of everyday life. This situation denies what we know
professionally to be true, namely that there are predictable
life crises, and that conflict is inevitable. Therefore, instead
of using the self expectation of managing conflict con-structively,
such couples are consumed with guilt for having such human
frailities. Any reality in the marriage that is in violation of
Church teachings will precipitate this kind of stress. One
reality that is often owned when dissolution of the marriage
seems eminent is the anger expressed by couples as to why they
were married in the first place. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
If premarital pregnancy was the
cause (71% of the marriages in Salt Lake City), this is
sometimes used by either or both of the parties as a scapegoat
or excuse for their marital infidelity and/or other destructive
behaviors. It's easy to rationalize that a forced marriage
justifies irresponsible, immature actions. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The examples cited above
illustrate the paradox that the Church's strong religious values
not only bring about a marriage but they may also contribute to
its demise. Counselors need to be aware of this situation so as
to mitigate the "double divorce" phenomenon that occurs when
members leave their marriage and leave the Church
simultaneously. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
2. Loss and Depression—This
second stage of the divorce is related to the separation,
anxiety and grief reaction caused by loss of roles,
relationships, status, friends, one's partner, and usually, for
the man, his children and home. Such dramatic changes interrupt
familiar habit patterns and ways of living everyday life. The
divorcing L.D.S. couple may feel a loss of face with respect to
the Church President McKay's oft quoted remarks: "No success in
life can compensate for failure in the home" and feel this is no
longer an ideal but a resounding chastisement which reinforces
[p.11] feelings of
inadequacy. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Regardless of how bad the
relationship was—it did order one's life and losing it may
precipitate some drastic reactions. Sometimes the feeling that
"all is lost" leads to a sort of hedonism that may look on the
surface like selfishness or immaturity, but often masks despair.
All of the associative behaviors of "a fallen person" may occur
as the "guilty" party plays the role of the "sinful person." The
"wronged" spouse may even begin to act out in retaliation or in
an effort to get even. During this stage, both may be hampered
in their constructive coping efforts by fatigue and feelings of
hopelessness. The counselor has an important contribution to
make by acting as an alter-ego. The client needs sustaining and
support with regard to his/her personal worth and concerning the
prospects for a future, especially as it pertains to the Church.
One goal in the helping endeavor is to prevent acting out
behaviors (or at least minimize them) that result from feelings
of despair and restlessness. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
3. Anger and ambivalence is the
third stage of working through a divorce. After denial is
resolved and the depression is over, the anger will be expressed
more directly. Sometimes interaction between spouses at this
point is vindictive, punitive, or even violent. They may not
only be expressing anger at each other more openly, but also at
those who have taken sides during their problems. Sometimes
anger is vented at the Church for not helping them more, and/or
at those who have taken sides during their problems. Sometimes
anger is vented at the Church for not helping them more, and/or
at those in the Church who tried to help and failed. This period
includes feelings of alienation and isolation. It is a purging
time and a time to combat the ambivalence about whether or not
to divorce that suddenly and surprisingly may surface. The
practicality issues arise and sometimes one or both of the
parties vacillate between returning to the familiar, unhappy
situation and felling the fear of the unknown. If they continue
on the divorcing track they will need to work through stage
four. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
L.D.S. counselors may experience
conflicts themselves and begin to represent a position of
non-divorce rather than allow the clients to resolve this stage
for themselves. L.D.S. people are very conscious of leads from
persons in authority positions. This orientation may cause
couples in conflict to assign more authority in the
decision-making to the counselor than this phase of the
divorcing process would indicate. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
4. Reorientation of Life Style
and Identity—For many L.D.S., being a non-married person in the
Church is like living in limbo. They try to see the non-married
state as transitory. This may be a defense
[p.12] against feelings of
social stigma and of "not being O.K." During this stage,
divorcing couples are vulnerable in many areas. For some, this
stage reflects a choice point—they may reorganize their life in
harmony with the Church or in antagonism to the Church. They may
form a new relationship on a rebound to avoid facing the reality
of being alone or avoid social contacts altogether. Time is an
important factor. As counselors, we should encourage divorcing
couples to leave time to grow and to take stock, and above all,
not to be in such a hurry to remarry and to reconstruct their
lives that they make unwise decisions. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The many problems confronting
divorced persons often put them back into a real identity
crisis, They must ask, "Who am I apart from my spouse?" For
those who married young and only know the identity of husband
and father, it may require the fundamental task of defining,
"Who do I want to be?" The identity crisis associated with
divorce includes the whole problem of being faced with a
redefinition of one's sexual self. Within the bonds of marriage,
sexual expression is endorsed by the Church. After the divorce,
these same behaviors are taboo. It is important for the
counselors to initiate discussions with clients in this area
that is often avoided. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The
counseling task in this phase is to help the client to
define a life style that is congruent for him and to help him to
keep a 'here and now' focus. He can be enabled to learn from the
past but must be careful to not carry the past into the present. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
5. Acceptance and Integration—As
the fifth and final stage, the work here is to guide the client
to discover and acknowledge "he's O.K.," and she's O.K.,
too." If final resolution is to be achieved, each person needs
to reach a point of accepting himself as a
divorced person with nothing to prove and no need to be
defensive or reactionary. Many problems within remarriage occur
because couples have failed to get thoroughly psychologically
divorced, as well as legally. They must learn to accept
their
divorced state and develop a new social and personal
identity (Wiseman, 205-212). Once the
divorced father has reached the stage of integration, the
Church as a formal organization becomes a valuable resource
supporting remarriage efforts. Whereas in stage four, the
counselor was trying to buffer the client from the press for
remarriage, this is no longer necessary. Programs and group
activities sponsored by the Church become resources for giving
direction to the client during the stage of re-integration.
Client self-acceptance is essential if these tangible resources
are going to also be psychologically available. |
|
| |
|
| |
In nearly half-million families
in the United States, the father is the primary
parent. 8.4% OF CHILDREN IN ONE—PARENT
DIVORCED FAMILIES RESIDE WITH THE FATHER (Gasser &
Taylor, 1976, p. 397). Between 1964 and 1972, the number of
divorced and separated
fathers heading households alone increased by 71% (Orthner,
Brown & Ferguson, p. 431). One could expect this trend to be
accelerated as the women's lib movements' impact on the family
is manifest. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
There is an increasing
recognition that
fathers are as often the "psychological
parent" in the family. When such families split—these
fathers undergo unusual stress fearing that the mother
will get custody and not meet the children's psychological
needs. Often men are unaware that in Utah as well as many other
states they have as much right to custody of minor children as
does the mother. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Two of the traditional roles
divorced
fathers should be instructed to maintain, whether they
are the custodial
parent or the visiting
parent, are those of "provider" and "nurturer." The
common expectation for the father to remain the primary provider
for the family after the divorce may produce stress and conflict
for him. He is placed in the position of doubling the financial
responsibilities of fatherhood. Some
fathers report feeling valued only as "a walking
pocketbook." The
divorced father paying alimony and child support may not
be able to afford a second marriage—particularly if that also
includes the additional burden of "acquired" children (Messinger,
1976). The nurturing role is one wherein the
single
parent father receives support from the L. D. S. Church.
Men are encouraged to help in rearing the children and if the
Family Home Evening program has been a part of his homelife, he
has been given opportunities to develop expressive relationships
with his children. Recent studies show that
fathers are capable of being as nurturant with children
as mothers (Parke & Garwin, p. 367). However, no matter how
clear the expectation or how motivated the father, the skills
for the nurturing role may be lacking. Counselors must be aware
of the support and training many
fathers will require if they are to successfully fulfill
this role. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Single
Parent Father as Visiting
Parent |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
The most important question a
counselor can help a
single, visiting father to answer is, "When is my
presence with the family helpful or a hindrance?" Each
[p.13] visit with the
children must be carefully planned and selected with due regard
to timing. The counselor is responsible for exploring the
father's reasons for the visit. Support should be extended for
motivations related to the children's well-being. Expected
outcomes from the visit should be specified and the means for
accomplishing them explored. The reactions of the children and
the former spouse should be anticipated to maximize constructive
coping on the father's part. In order for couples to carry out
their difficult task of being parents together even though
divorced, they must be able to put the welfare of their
children above their own. This requires a mature resolution that
may require
counseling to achieve. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Visits with children should not
be activity-centered all the time. Time should be planned so
father and child can engage in meaningful interaction and
communication of feelings. Work and study, as well as "fun"
activities should be part of visits. The visiting father should
be helped to understand how to manage visitation times so they
don't penalize either the child or the parents in terms of their
own needs for other social contacts. Some children of
divorced parents report they have no time for themselves
after supporting mother all week and visiting dad all weekend.
Also, if visits are restricted to weekends, they can drastically
reduce father's time for rest and recreation. Visits should
never be used as a vehicle to romance or harass the ex-spouse. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
The fact of being separated from
his children may make the father more conscious of what he wants
for his children. These goals and values should be discussed by
both parents to avoid mixed messages to the child and to reduce
undercutting of each parent's efforts. Divorce does not release
parents of the responsibility for cooperative effort in their
children's behalf. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Single
Parent Father as Custodian
Parent |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
The traditional role of the
father consists of such things as: strength, competence, wisdom,
dependability, stability (Maxwell, 387-388). Some men are so
sex-role stereotyped that they find it difficult to move out of
the "keeping" role and into a more interactional, nurturing role
when they are the custodial
parent. They often experience conflict between the
providing and nurturing roles. Guilt about working too many
hours and not spending enough time with the children in the home
is common. Contrary to expectations that the custodial father
experiences pressure to get a housekeeper-wife to survive,
studies show
fathers can organize the family to meet its own
housekeeping tasks in a self-sufficient manner. Three-fourths of
fathers in one study needed no outside help (Orthner,
Brown and Ferguson, p. 435). Most
fathers felt capable and successful in their ability to
be the primary
parent for children. This independence of
single
parent father families should be supported as a healthy
adjustment. Counselors should help
single
parent
fathers to resist the pressure to marry for the sake of a
housekeeper. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
One problem occurs with such
regularity for custodial
fathers that it should receive special attention. This is
a misinterpretation of the natural distance that often develops
between father and adolescent daughter. Parents must be
cautioned not to blame such developmental struggles onto the
divorce. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Just as
single
parent women are encouraged to provide father figure
models for their children, so should a counselor encourage
single
parent-custodial
fathers to enlist the help of mother surrogates (i.e.,
the grandmothers, aunts, "big sisters," Sunday School
[p.14] and Primary teachers)
to keep the female influence in the family. The Church is an
excellent resource for this need. A father's legacy to children
can also include his ease in modeling traditionally "female"
jobs himself, i.e., cooking, cleaning, and even ironing. This
role flexibility is rapidly becoming a necessity for all
"modern" families whether they are
divorced or intact. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Below are some guidelines for
successful
single parenting from a book called, Growth Through
Divorce (Smoke, 1976, pp. 60-66). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
1. Don't try to be both
parents to your children. Trying to be super
parent will only bring you frustration and fatigue.
Improve what you are and don't try to be what you are not. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
2. Don't force your children
into playing the role of the departed partner. A child needs
to be a child. They cannot fill an adult's place, so don't force
them to. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
3. Be the
parent you are. (Not friend, buddy, pal, big sister
or brother, etc.) Children deeply resent having their parents
try to invade their world. They NEED a
parent. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
4. Be honest with your
children. Richard Gardiner (The Boys and Girls Book About
Divorce) "Half-truths produce confusion and distrust,
whereas truth, albeit painful, engenders trust and gives the
child the security of knowing exactly where he stands. He is
then in a position to handle situations effectively." |
|
| |
|
|
| |
5. Don't put your
ex-spouse down in front of your children. lt's a game
that nobody wins and eventually causes the child to lose all
respect for either
parent. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
6. Don't make your children
undercover agents who report on the other parent's
current activities. This puts children in a double-bind. A
child has the right to privately enjoy a
parent without feeling disloyal to the other
parent. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
7. The children of divorce
need both a mother and a father. (Only exceptions are when
parent might cause emotional or bodily harm to the
child.) Don't let your feelings about the departed
parent deny your child the right to a continuing
relationship with that
parent. (Sometimes a poor spouse is a good
parent.) Children need to see the departed
parent in a real life setting. Let them help with chores
and be part of your world. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
9. Share your dating life and
social interests with your children. They want to know how
the relationship will affect them. Hiding your new social
interests and not informing children is a greater threat than
keeping them informed. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
10. Help your children keep
the good memories of your past marriage alive. You have no
right to rob your children of their happy memories. Good
memories are worth keeping. They help us become what we are and
generate hope for the future. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
11. Work out a management and
existence structure for your children with your ex-spouse.
When feelings cool and perspectives are regained, separated
parents should be able to face the reality that child raising
goes on and should go on as smoothly as possible for the welfare
of the children. The Judge of the Superior Court in Santa Ana,
California gives divorcing parents a brochure entitled, "Parents
Are Forever." |
|
| |
|
|
| |
12. If possible, try not to
disrupt the many areas in your children's lives that offer them
safety and security. The same house, school, friends, church
and clubs will help maintain a balance that can offset to a
degree the loss of a
parent. If this is not possible—rehearse new situations
and present them as an adventure—not a threat. Let them take
part in decision making. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
13. If your child does not
resume normal development and growth in life within a year of
the divorce, he/she may need the special care and help of a
professional counselor. Some adjustment problems are normal.
If negative patterns persist—seek help. "Being a
single
parent is a skill to be learned." |
|
| |
|
| |
Mormon counselors should help
divorced clients resist the press for remarriage before
the five stages of divorce have been completely resolved. L.D.S.
clients often feel a push to remarry in order to regain a sense
of status within the Church and the community. Not unlike other
divorced persons, many remarry the same spouse.
Regardless—remarriage should wait until the resolution of the
divorce is accomplished. Divorcees should be cautious in
remarrying anyone without
counseling help. Particularly in remarrying the former
spouse they may remarry for the same reasons as they married for
the first time around. The instant replay may end with the same
ineffective results as at first. As counselors restrain an urge
to "match-make" and help support the moritorium rather than
urging a premature re-entry. Six of seven will remarry within
three years but should be forewarned and forearmed about the
unique problems that research shows plague remarriages (Messinger,
1976). |
|
| |
|
| |
Counseling
divorced
single
parent
fathers is a complex task. First comes the task of
healing the psychic wounds of divorce: freeing the client from
entrapment in the past and moving him toward the process of
living constructively in the present (Drantzler, 1973, p. 76).
Then, since the role of
single
parent father has not yet been Institutionalized in terms
of role clarity with explicit expected behaviors (Mendes, 1976,
440), the
single
parent father is in need of much support. The counselor
and groups of other
single
parent
fathers can provide the stability a
[p.15] man may be reluctant
to seek. Fatherhood can be "person-making" (Maxwell, 1976, p.
391), and counselors have found that playing a contributing part
in that process can be most rewarding. |
|
| |
|
| |
Bach, George R., The Intimate
Enemy. New York: William Morrow & Co., Inc. 1969. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Bieler, H., and Meredith, D.,
FatherPower. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1975. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Drantzler, Mel Creative
Divorce. M. Evans & Co., Inc., New York, 1973. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Egleson, Janet and Jim,
Parents Without Partners. E.O. Dutton, New York, 1971. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Gasser, Rita D. and Taylor,
Claribel M., "Role Adjustment of
Single
Parent
Fathers with Dependent Children." The Family
Coordinator, 25 (October, 1976), pp. 397-401. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Hunt, Martin W., The World of
the Formerly Married. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lynn, D.B., The Father: His
Role in Child Development. Monterey: Books Cole, 1974. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Maddox, Brenda, The Half
Parent. M. Evans & Co., Inc., New York, 1975. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Maxwell, Joseph W., "The Keeping
Fathers of America," The Family Coordinator, 25
(October, 1976), pp. 387-392. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Mendes, Helan A., "Single
Fathers," The Family Coordinator, 25 (October,
1976), pp. 439-444. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Messinger, Lillian, "Remarriage
Between
Divorced People with Children from Previous Marriages: A
Proposal for Preparation for Remarriage," Journal of Marriage
and Family
Counseling, April, 1976, pp. 193-200. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Orthner, Dennis K., Brown,
Terry, and Ferguson, Dennis, "Single-Parent
Fatherhood: An Emerging Family Life Style," The Family
Coordinator 25, (October, 1976), pp. 429-437. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Satir, V., Peoplemaking.
Palo Alto, California: Science and Behavior Books, 1972.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Smoke, Jim, Growth Through
Divorce. Harvest House Publishers: Irvine, California, 1976. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Wiseman, Reva S., "Crisis Theory
and the Process of Divorce," Social Casework, 56,
(April, 1975), pp. 205-213. |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
I looked about me and made a
feeble effort to feel,
I spoke a few meaningless words to folks nearby.
I sensed the unexciting rituals so much a part of life.
Then, you appeared within the crowd,
As if from nowhere,
Your creator unknown and unseen.
You, perhaps, are the answer to the unspoken prayer,
The sparkling reality to replace the empty dream. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Lester N. Downing |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Source: AMCAP
Journal, Vol.3, No. 1 (1977 Issue), pp.10-15 |
|